The Kush friendly brand is focused on quality and standing up in the fight against the misguided culture of cannabis prohibition. The focus is not so much the question of why people have this culture, but rather why it persists. It began as a side issue in the deliberations of the League of Nations' Opium focus in the 20s of the last century, the ban is maintained through the years and why this is makes no sense.
In other words, the senseless prohibition holds great worth to agents that would be on 'standby' without them. Otherwise, they would be forced to twiddle their thumbs and not have any measurable 'production'. This example serves to show that there are important features or benefits for bodies that may be implementing the ban.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
The alleged dangers of cannabis have not been proven in a lab yet, on the basis of what some researchers have discovered. These are experts from Sweden, France and England. People the world over are talking about what they think these dangers are understood as in their own countries.
Describing the dangers and making objections to this is not the first ambition here. The defenders' aim is to give a general description of the main function of cannabis prohibition anywhere, that legitimizes to the naked eye a version of the dangers that at a certain moment came into fashion, however mistakenly that may have been. What is mean by the culture of cannabis prohibition is the system for which stories about the wickedness of cannabis keep getting manufactured.
The actual effects have not been tested in the different political systems and people in the world are told quite seriously about these facts, which are baseless. These lies keep extending their own shelf life and thus flow across the world into some or other form of active enforcement of cannabis prohibition. In addition, all sorts of different mixtures of stories that depend on complex historical developments in different political systems have been added to spice up the lies.
Another interesting observation about the nature of the stories about the dangers of this innocent (and proven to have cause no deaths in the last 2 decades and more) plant can be found in a famous article by Jerome Himmelstein. The work was called 'From weed killer to drop out drug'. The author describes the relatively short period of the existence of the cannabis ban in the U. S., and the way that the powers that be justify it.
There is no need to go into the debate about cannabis as a stepping stone drug. Just leave that statement as one that would lead to a series of epidemiological publications to tear it apart with proof about the unsustainability of cannabis as a stepping stone drug. The solution? Put your kit and show your colors for what's right!
In other words, the senseless prohibition holds great worth to agents that would be on 'standby' without them. Otherwise, they would be forced to twiddle their thumbs and not have any measurable 'production'. This example serves to show that there are important features or benefits for bodies that may be implementing the ban.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
The alleged dangers of cannabis have not been proven in a lab yet, on the basis of what some researchers have discovered. These are experts from Sweden, France and England. People the world over are talking about what they think these dangers are understood as in their own countries.
Describing the dangers and making objections to this is not the first ambition here. The defenders' aim is to give a general description of the main function of cannabis prohibition anywhere, that legitimizes to the naked eye a version of the dangers that at a certain moment came into fashion, however mistakenly that may have been. What is mean by the culture of cannabis prohibition is the system for which stories about the wickedness of cannabis keep getting manufactured.
The actual effects have not been tested in the different political systems and people in the world are told quite seriously about these facts, which are baseless. These lies keep extending their own shelf life and thus flow across the world into some or other form of active enforcement of cannabis prohibition. In addition, all sorts of different mixtures of stories that depend on complex historical developments in different political systems have been added to spice up the lies.
Another interesting observation about the nature of the stories about the dangers of this innocent (and proven to have cause no deaths in the last 2 decades and more) plant can be found in a famous article by Jerome Himmelstein. The work was called 'From weed killer to drop out drug'. The author describes the relatively short period of the existence of the cannabis ban in the U. S., and the way that the powers that be justify it.
There is no need to go into the debate about cannabis as a stepping stone drug. Just leave that statement as one that would lead to a series of epidemiological publications to tear it apart with proof about the unsustainability of cannabis as a stepping stone drug. The solution? Put your kit and show your colors for what's right!
About the Author:
You can visit www.kushwear.net for more helpful information about Show Your Colors And Taste With Kush Friendly.
No comments:
Post a Comment