Thursday, 29 January 2015

In A Counter Terrorism Fiction Novel, Who Are The Terrorists

By Ines Flores


Were there no glaring inconsistencies in the media version of events, Americans would not think what they do. If the 911 Commission Report was not more like a 911 Omission Report, Americans would not think what they do. With so many lies fired at them from a television set, the whole idea of a counter terrorism fiction novel is a bad joke.

More than half of all the citizens of the United States question the official narratives of events from Gulf of Tonkin to the more current Paris shooting. The world media claims a policeman is shot and killed even though their own footage shows the bullet going about a foot past his head and bouncing off concrete. They tried to remove the clip from public consciousness, but there are too many people out there with the Hoppa.

So now Americans must wonder who that officer is or was, and whether or not he is dead or alive. If he is dead, then they must wonder who killed him and when. These are questions the average citizen of the United States is asking, but the average media outlet pretends that footage never existed and puts up a bunch of talking heads who claim to be experts on terror.

The words countering terror have become synonymous with the double-speak outlined in the book 1984. Like the book, government goons encourage citizens to spy on one-another and watch for signs of aberrant behavior that could spell a terrorist plot. Meanwhile, the only terrorists plotting appear to be working for Mossad, MI-5, and the CIA.

It makes the people of America wonder who is acting as the Minister of Propaganda novels when a book comes out supporting the notion that the whole world is held captive by the evil Islamic stranglehold. Most Muslim people, like most people, are barely getting by. Yet everyone is supposed to believe that they scrounged up the resources to organize something on the scale of the Mumbai shootings.

To fool the people, they throw a drugged Muslim in our faces, placing him on an airplane bound for the United States even though he lacked identification, ticket, passport, or luggage. A handler was with him initially, and somehow got it through to a TSA officer that the man could fly even though he was on the terror watchlist. This man came to be known as the Underwear Bomber that day.

A shooting in a movie theater was reported to have been committed by a lone gunman, yet there was more than one shooter claimed by witnesses. Military-grade tear gas was thrown into the audience from more than one direction, and there was more than one gas mask found at the scene. The claimed lone gunman shows up to court with orange hair, so drugged he can barely stand.

The most priceless gem came from the couple who claimed to be parents of a child killed in the Sandy Hook shooting. Someone from the news network released video footage from before they went on live television, and it revealed these two people laughing and generally cutting up with the media staff like old friends. Suddenly they were given a cue, and the two of them looked down in meditation; just as any actor would do to get himself into character.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment